Here, Challies really gets to the heart of the issue and begins to draw some serious lines. I found the last chapter particularly convicting, but there are some statements in this chapter that I think will be hard for many to digest. He certainly isn't about making his readers feel comfy-cozy!
He begins with recounting two real-life scenarios where law enforcement officials were concerned with counterfeit bills, except in one case, no crime had actually been committed because there was no "original" money of the sort to duplicate. There simply is no such thing as a $1,000,000 bill. Therefore, there can also be no such thing as a counterfeit of that bill. A $100 bill, on the other hand, presents an entirely legitimate problem because it exists and therefore can be counterfeited.
"The practice of spiritual discernment," he says, "is founded on a belief in the existence of both error and truth. This is not the subjective truth of a postmodern society but a full-blown, objective truth ~ the 'true truth' of Christianty.
When a person counterfeits Christian doctrine, he is not printing a million-dollar bill, creating a fictitious representation of something that could be. Rather, he is distorting what is really, truly, objectively true and is committing a serious crime against God." (p93)
"Many who profess to believe in Christ affirm Christianity as a collection of truths, and even very important, life-altering truths, but not as Truth; not as a worldview that encompasses all of life." (94, emphasis mine)
So? Where's your comfort level at?! If you're anything like me, you're probably starting to squirm a little! Or maybe you're just angry; defensively calling this fundamentalist dogma. If you're even still reading.
This is undisputably strong, strong language, and the implications are astronomical.
"Truth" is such a touchy subject these days. Sadly, even among believers. I can't help but feel that given this reality, we've made a wrong turn somewhere. The pursuit of Truth is something we should be passionate about, but we seem to have come to believe that good and evil are determined by our own choices or preferences. We seem to have lost our grip on the reality that things are OBJECTIVELY good or evil regardless of the subjective feelings they generate in us. Challies calls this giving our feelings undue authority to interpret truth. And THIS is why it is absolutely imperative believers measure good and evil based on the objective, unmoving standard of God's Word.
But this is where the hard work comes in again. To be a discerning Christian with a truly Christian worldview, we MUST think rightly about God, because "what we believe necessarily impacts what we do. What we do is premised on what we believe. Thus the closer our thoughts are to the reality of who God is and what he is like, the more our lives will be a reflection of him." (p97, emphasis mine)
Right thinking about God is our best defense against worldliness because it will always lead us back to Jesus, back to the cross. Worldliness and a lack of discernment will lead us to ourselves and a subjective view of truth, a view that's based on how something compares with societal trends and norms.
Worldliness is sneaky. Challies paraphrases and borrows quotes from pastor and author Joshua Harris and his illustration of "half a poison pill" when it comes to thinking that just a little "error" every now and again is harmless, that it won't change who we are
or how we believe. We tend to believe that just a little bit of evil won't harm us, that we have a "sin threshold" that we'll recognize when we arrive and will decide not to cross.
"The greatest danger of popular media," Harris has said, "is not a one-time exposure to a particular instance of sin (as serious as that can be). It's how long-term exposure to worldliness ~ little chunks of poison pill, day after day, week after week ~ can deaden our hearts to the ugliness of sin." (p103)
I cannot help but be reminded of the quote regarding sitcoms I posted here and on Facebook a while back and the ensuing comments. This essentially echoes and reinforces that train of thought.
And THEN, to top it all off, in my devotions today, I studied the fourth chapter of James. Verses 4 and 17 are pretty pointed as well: "You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God. Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn't do it, sins." Man, this chapter is tough.
Now the obvious argument is GREY AREAS, situations and circumstances the Bible doesn't specifically address. Challies is rather harsh in examining this (although I've come to expect nothing less!), stating truly grey areas are rare and most often only arise because we haven't done our homework in God's Word to clarify them, or our own sinful desires have interfered with our judgment. Ouch.
He then lightens up a little to conclude the chapter by presenting an interesting perspective on the usefulness of the grey areas ~ that they demonstrate the need for a well-developed, biblically-informed conscience, and that they provide us with the opportunity to express humility and dependence on God. Something I have NOT been good at in the past.
The conclusion is really quite simple: to guard ourselves against worldliness, the poison half-pill, we must live in a way that is consistent with God's will and the objective truth of His Word, because what we believe to be true about Him will NECESSARILY affect the way we live.
So once again we see the vital importance of becoming dedicated, life-long theologians with an unquenchable thirst to know more about God.

